Rules
for
interpreting
Nostradamus’
Prophecies.
My
working
framework
is
achieved
by:
-
using
sequences
of
adjacent
whole
anagrams,
-
requiring
the
anagrams
to
be
interconnected
to
each
other
by
their
meaning
or
sense,
-
expecting
the
resultant
words
and
message
to
develop
Nostradamus'
text
for
that
line
or
verse,
-
finding
key
anagrams
that
have
low
recurrence
elsewhere,
-
accepting
that
Nostradamus'
text
is
meaningful
and
that
words
and
spelling
are
purposefully
chosen,
-
using
the
interwoven
consistency
across
and
between
all
the
verses
in
Nostradamus'
Prophecies,
-
relying
on
Nostradamus'
use
of
a
past,
present
and
future
framework
to
give
his
code
strength.
Why
has
the
code
remained
hidden
if
the
method
is
as
simple
as
both
Nostradamus
and
I
suggest?
Because
it
involves
one
single
mind-boggling
step
and
three
commonly
used
moves
to
transform
the
original
message
into
the
new.
The
mind
boggling
step
is
that
many
of
Nostradamus’
anagrams
appear
to
be
in
modern
English,
something
unacceptable
unless
Nostradamus
could
truly
see
into
the
future.
The
three
moves
are
much
more
pedestrian
as
they
have
been
in
use
since
ancient
times.
The
following
lists
the
moves
in
order
of
performance.
-
split
the
letters
into
different
groups
-
rearrange
them
within
the
new
groupings
-
arrange
the
new
words
to
form
a
coherent
message.
"By
means
of
this,
past,
present
and
future
become
one
eternity,
for
all
things
are
naked
and
open."
Nostradamus
in
his
Preface
to
the
Prophecies
1555
ADDENDUM:
Feb 2013
-
Nostradamus
uses
a
search-engine
method
based
on
key
words.
-
In
order
to
identify
the
most
important
keys
Nostradamus
incorporates
a
capital
or
long-ess
into
the
anagram.
-
The
exception
to
addendum
2
is
that
normally
capitalized
words
may
have
their
capital
letter
cancelled
out.
-
The
priority
order
for
keys
is
based
on
their
capitalization
followed
by
the
strength
of
the
adjacent
sequence
of
which
the
anagrams
are
part.
ADDENDUM: May 2014
-
Nostradamus uses an 'x' or a 'z'
for the letter 's' in very small but important words to distinguish
them from the many that are generated by chance (e.g. partz, pazt,
failx.
EXAMPLE
of rules usage C.7
Q.19 L.3 (See
C.07 Q.19
for full verse)
This deed will be
debated for a long time.
Son faict Sera vn long temps de
batu
S onfaictS eravnlongtem
psdebatu onfaictS eravnlongtem psdebatuS
factionS governmental budapestS
Budapests governmental factions
The
final
line
is
derived
by
changing
the
places
where
the
blanks
occur
in
the
line
and
arranging
the
lettering
of
the
new
groupings
into
words.
The
groupings
are
chosen
to
mark
out
those
words
that
are
least
likely
to
be
there
by
chance.
In
this
example
Budapests
and
'governmental'
only
occur
in
this
quatrain
of
the
Prophecies.
The
anagrams
of
both
'Budapests'
and
'Factions'
contain
a
capital
letter
and
this
identifies
them
as
important
key
words.
Note
that
the
anagram
for
'Budapest'
which
is
an
actual
name
occurs
as
an
anagram
without
any
capitals
and
this
is
consistent
with
the
exception
noted
in
the
rules.
'Factions'
occurs
in
two
other
verses
so
this
marked
word
will
provide
the
prime
path
to
other
verses.
These
words
are
adjacent
and
unusually
they
use
all
the
letters
in
the
line.
These
features
decrease
the
probability
that
they
are
there
by
chance
alone.
And
when
the
line’s
text
(in
blue)
is
read
it
can
be
seen
that
the
topic
is
quite
apt
for
a
governmental
setting.
In
addition
none
of
the
anagrams
found
are
simplistic
rearrangements
of
words
in
the
text.
This
is
a
highly
complex
combination
where
the
likelihood
of
chance
being
its
creator
is
far
lower
than
reason
would
suggest
is
possible.
There
is
more
to
this
verse
that
is
brought
out
in
other
pages
on
this
site
and
these
will
show
more
of
the
rules
in
use.
|